PMO Awards Adjudicator Confidentiality Agreement

As a JUDGE, your role is to draw on your expertise to fairly and reasonably assess the project management office (PMO) team’s efforts in the six criteria of the competition. A scoring tool will be made available to assess the entrants. Judging will be done virtually and the approximate time commitment is 6 to 16 hours from July to November.

How does it work?

The competition is made up of an Interview and Evaluation stage. Each entrant is judged by a panel of no less than three neutral judges (i.e. judge should not be an employee, consultant or have any active engagements with the entering PMO; judges should not have other obvious conflicts of interest.)  The top three highest scoring entrants will advance to the Evaluation stage which will be judged by the international judging panel.

Guidelines

  • Judges are expected to ask insightful questions that target the PMO’s response to the evaluation criteria.
  • Judges should not discuss their scoring decisions until the finalist announcement has been made.
  • Judges should refrain from providing feedback or recommendations during the interview.
  • Judges are expected to provide clear commentary and actionable recommendations to support their evaluation and scoring assessment.

Entrants:

  • Transnet
  • Mpact
  • Old Mutual
  • MANCOSA
  • University of Western Cape
  • Altron
  • Medscheme
  • BankservAfrica
  • V&A Waterfront
  • City of Ekurhuleni

I declare that my role as adjudicator of this PMO Awards submission does not present a conflict of interest. I agree to keep the submitted information and adjudication score confidential and to refer any enquiries regarding the scoring and adjudication process to pmoawards@go2ppo.com.

Please write out your name in full to sign.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.